

Other streets where something similar to what is proposed for Lankershim Blvd are Westwood Blvd, Sepulveda Blvd and Bundy Dr.

These results showed that there was a 39% decrease in the rate of injuries per km ridden on streets that had bike lanes compared to nearby streets that did not have any bicycle infrastructure.

Adding bike lanes increases that to 7% of the adult population.Ī recent study was released by the University of British Columbia in Toronto and Vancouver Canada using interviews with former patients of local hospitals that needed treatment from bicycle injuries. Survey results by the city of Portland Oregon showed that less than 1% of the adult population would want to ride a bicycle in mixed traffic on a busy street. This increases the capacity of this street going south. Going south, towards the Cahuenga Pass, there will be an additional lane added by way of the bicycle lane. Why would you take away a travel lane that has intersections that are operating at beyond capacity at peak hours and give it to a few people that ride bicycles? Yet, the reaction by a lot of people in this area is that this sounds like the city is lacking in common sense. This will make it perhaps faster and more convenient to reach the two subway stations that are on Lankershim Blvd. On Lankershim Blvd, from Chandler Blvd to Ventura Blvd, the city is proposing to take away one north bound through lane for motor vehicles to put in two bicycle lanes. Something very similar is proposed for bike lane installation in the city of LA. The HOV lanes have proven to decrease the level of congestion on freeways in the LA area. Afterall, why would you take lanes away on a congested freeway to devote them to what looks like a few vehicles? The idea for toll or HOV lanes is that this will discourage some people from driving in single occupancy vehicles. This must look like a idiotic idea to most people who drive on this freeway.
